The EU notified body industry association, TEAM-NB, and the European Confederation of Notified Bodies Group (NB-Med), have drafted a position paper in a bid to clarify how to apply the EU MDR's regulatory provisions on spinal implants. The document features a risk-based decision tree to demonstrate whether spinal implants – both fusion and non-fusion devices – should be in risk class IIb or III. This will determine the amount of work that needs to be done.
Their joint work was prompted by the complex wording used in Classification Rule 8 of the MDR (contained in Annex VIII, 5.4), on implantable devices and long-term surgically-invasive devices. The two groups felt that this impeded a harmonized interpretation of the regulation, and moreover that it lacked clarity regarding the level of scrutiny that notified bodies would need to apply when overseeing the manufacturers of such devices.
This states that all implantable devices and long-term surgically-invasive devices are in class IIb unless they:
are total or partial joint replacements, in which case they are in class III, with the exception of ancillary components, such as screws, wedges, plates and instruments; or
are spinal disc replacement implants and implantable devices that come into contact with the spinal column, in which case they are in class III, with the exception of components such as screws, wedges, plates and instruments.
There are many complexities around this, however, as are listed in the Position Paper.
The two organizations say that “with this position paper, notified bodies are providing their view and interpretation to the various EU regulators, including the European Commmision, enabling them to comment and correct if deemed necessary.”
The authors of the position paper believe that the decision tree will reduce the number of unnecessary submissions for clinical evaluation consultation, a regulatory process involving a close scrutiny reserved for the highest-risk devices.
This, they say, is in line with the intended focus of the planned expert panels – on novel devices and devices with possible major clinical or health impacts.
“With this measure,” the authors add, "a smaller number of experts at the panel are needed, reducing the burden on the EU Commission to establish such an expert panel within a short period of time.”
They offer the following decision-tree on spinal implant classification:
|
Risk class |
|
Type of technology |
Degree of review |
|
IIb |
Fusion devices |
|
|
|
a) |
Well-established technologies
|
To be sampled according to typical rules for class IIb devices (at least one representative technical documentation per generic device group) |
|
|
b) |
Not so well-established technologies: |
Full review of technical documentation, similar to class III devices (100% sampling) |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
III |
Non-fusion devices(eg dynamic fixation) |
Subject to a clinical evaluation consultation procedure, including review by an expert panel as part of the scrutiny procedure |
|
Medtech Insight: 世界の医療機器・医療技術の最新情報
By Brian Yang
The latest figures from China's National Health Commission show infections of the new Wuhan coronavirus are continuing to pile up, spreading to more cities in the country and abroad as travel for the Lunar New Year festival goes into high gear. Meanwhile, diagnostics companies are rushing to have test kits ready.
Topics Coronovirus
Medtech Insight: 世界の医療機器・医療技術の最新情報
By Marion Webb
An expert panel at CES 2020 discussed Deloitte's vision for health care in 2040, with the empowered consumer managing their own health, enabled by a new ecosystem of secure, open access to data and "nudges" to change behaviors. Consulting firm Deloitte foresees outside disruptors dismantling the traditional health-care system, but panelists from Johnson & Johnson and Anthem flexed their muscles.
Medtech Insight: 世界の医療機器・医療技術の最新情報
The US-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) treaty calls for the three countries to “recognize audits” performed under the Medical Device Single Audit Program. MDSAP is already used by device makers in the US and Canada so they can undergo one audit by an accredited third party to satisfy quality regulations. That leaves Mexico as the odd country out when it comes to using the popular program – and that means it has some catching up to do after the USMCA is ratified by all three nations. Former longtime FDA official Kim Trautman weighs in on how Mexico can incorporate MDSAP into its regulatory framework.
製品説明＆デモお申込
専任スタッフによるデモンストレーションを兼ねたサービスの詳しいご説明、または無料トライアルを常時受け付けています。ご希望の場合は下記のフォームよりお気軽にお申し込みください。
＊一部のサービスでは無料トライアルをご利用になれません。
お問い合わせ先
ご質問等ございましたらお気軽にご連絡下さい。
日本（平日：9時～18時）
電話：+81 (0)3 6273 4260
Email：inquiry.jp@informa.com
レポートストア
オンラインショップのレポートストアでは、医療用医薬品の市場調査・分析レポートを常時1000本以上販売しています。レポート1本単位で購入でき、オンラインでご提供いたします。
お探しの情報が見つからない場合はお問い合わせ先までお気軽にご連絡ください。
In Vivo(インビボ)は、医療用医薬品の企業全般、バイオ医薬品企業、医療機器・診断機器メーカーの経営層・トップマネジメントを対象としたニュース配信サービスです。35年以上の経験を有するベテランの専門記者とアナリストが様々な観点から今日の医薬品産業を分析し、経営層のハイレベルかつグローバルな情報ニーズに応えるニュースや読み応えのある記事を提供しています。
Meddevicetracker(メッドデバイストラッカー)は、医療機器の開発状況について適応疾患や医療機器のタイプから検索できるツールです。1,000社以上の会社による5,000を超える製品群、2,000件以上の医療機器の臨床試験など比類ない規模で医療機器市場を網羅しています。
