Pharma Intelligence is part of the Informa Intelligence Division of Informa PLC
This is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
US Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Patty Murray of Washington State recently sent a letter to FDA officials Brett Giroir and Jeff Shuren that raises doubts about a planned bill calling for a progressive approval pathway for medical devices.
Two US senators have sent a letter to US Food and Drug Administration officials that raises new concerns about the agency’s legislative plan for a conditional progressive approval pathway for medical devices.
Democrats Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Patty Murray of Washington State – both members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee – said in their 4 November letter that they’re worried about how the agency intends to maintain device safety and efficacy through use of a progressive regulatory pathway.
The FDA in April 2019 proposed the pathway’s creation, which appeared to be “strikingly similar” to a conditional approval pathway for certain animal drugs, the senators told acting FDA Commissioner Brett Giroir and FDA device center director Jeff Shuren in their letter.
The conditional approval pathway lets manufacturers make certain animal drugs available on the market after demonstrating a “reasonable expectation of effectiveness,” rather than the stricter “substantial evidence of effectiveness” standard currently required for full human-drug approval, Warren and Murray said.
“Progressive approval would weaken initial approval standards and allow certain medical devices onto the market before … completely demonstrating the device’s safety,” Warren and Murray wrote. The duo noted that the FDA had cited unmet needs for pediatric medical devices in justifying its proposal – but Warren and Murray raised questions about how the new pathway proposal would address those needs while maintaining safety and efficacy standards for medtech products.
Lawmakers Prod FDA On Postmarket Data Collection
Among the questions that Warren and Murray asked in their letter was what type of oversight the FDA envisions conducting on a progressive approval pathway to ensure safety standards are met, and how the agency would make its postmarket surveillance of progressively approved devices effective. They noted that an independent audit of the agency’s expedited approval pathways by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealed challenges with the FDA implementing postmarket requirements.
The senators also asked what real-world evidence would be sufficient to demonstrate a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness for devices reviewed under the progressive approval pathway, and if the FDA had ever relied exclusively on real-world evidence to support approval or clearance of a device.
Warren and Murray also wanted to know if device registries are sufficiently widespread and well developed so the agency can rely on them for data collection.
They also wrote that they are “disappointed by FDA’s clarification that the agency no longer fully stands by former commissioner [Scott] Gottlieb’s commitment that the ‘FDA does not believe this … pathway would be suitable for human medical products,’” and added that they continue to have questions regarding the eligibility criteria that FDA has in mind to carry out the conditional approval pathway proposal.
Warren and Murray of late have been sending several letters to the FDA regarding its handling of devices and other medical products, including a letter in late October questioning the agency’s regulation of digital devices. (Also see "US Senators Lay Out Concerns On FDA Digital Health Device Precertification Program" - Medtech Insight, 31 Oct, 2019.)
The lawmakers asked the FDA to respond to its progressive approval pathway letter by 13 November.
Medtech Insight: global medical technology news & analysis
By Ashley Yeo 12 Dec 2019
ConMed’s ambitions in orthopedics are to be the clinician’s support, develop differentiated offerings and avoid “me too” activity, before all...
Medtech Insight: global medical technology news & analysis
By Amanda Maxwell 12 Dec 2019
How do notified bodies ensure that their personnel, and the teams they allocate for conformity assessment of medical devices, have...
Medtech Insight: global medical technology news & analysis
By Ashley Yeo
The disruptive medtech M&A of recent years was not matched in the past year for volume, but there were isolated outbreaks of major activity, as shown in our company rankings.
Request a Trial
Whether you’re a small biotech start-up, research firm, generic manufacturer or a global pharmaceutical giant, you need focused, independent insight and opinion on market developments.
How can we help you?
Our team is always happy to hear from you. Please call us at:
Pharma Report Store
Have an immediate and specific information need?
Browse and buy from 1000s of analysis and research reports now:
Get a window into what the leading players across the biopharma, medtech, and diagnostics industries are thinking, as well as important insight into what your competitors are doing. Build your strategy with In Vivo.
In the continually evolving medtech competitive landscape, it is vital to stay up-to-date with key events. With Meddevicetracker, you’ll be able to anticipate upcoming filings, research clinical trial dates and data, and access market size information and expert forecasts, all in one place.
Looking for more products Product Finder
