skip to main content
Close Icon We use cookies to improve your website experience.  To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy.  By continuing to use the website, you consent to our use of cookies.
Global Search Configuration

The more the US Food and Drug Administration treats cannabinoids different from other dietary ingredients, says Council for Responsible Nutrition president and CEO Steve Mister, the more likely are changes to the regulatory framework that would harm the dietary supplement industry.

The latest exception that the FDA’s approach for making lawful the use cannabinoids, with cannabidiol (CBD) the most common in products other than drugs that the CRN sees as unnecessary and unhelpful is a provision in a recently introduced Senate bill, S.1698, to give the agency authority to develop unique labeling and packaging for cannabinoid-containing supplements and foods.

The change could inflict “long term damage” to supplement industry regulatory oversight, Mister told HBW Insight.

The supplement packaging and labeling requirements under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act passed in 1994 have served the industry and consumers well, he added.

“We believe the existing labeling requirements that apply to all dietary supplements can address this situation. … We are concerned about giving FDA additional authority for something that is going to be a dietary supplement.”

The language in the Senate bill would create an exception for the FDA for cannabinoid products, giving the agency “the right to create your own labeling requirement for this product,” Mister said. For other supplements, the agency’s labeling requirements still will have “to follow the rules of a dietary supplement.”

crn ceo steve mister: "We are concerned about giving FDA additional authority for something that is going to be a dietary supplement.” Source: CRN

DSHEA not only provides specific labeling requirements for supplements but also optional labeling statements, Mister noted. Examples are “not recommended for people under 18,” “not recommended for people who are pregnant” and “not recommended for those with underlying health conditions.”

However, S.1698 introduced earlier in May would allow the FDA to broaden the allowance of labeling statements for CBD that go beyond what is allowed other types of supplements. (US Senate Appetite For Lawful Use Of Cannabinoids Includes Food On Top Of Supplements)

In the House, H.R. 841 introduced in February instructs the FDA to allow cannabinoids’ use in supplements but not for foods as S.1698 does. It doesn’t allow the FDA to develop unique labeling and packaging for cannabinoid supplements, instead noting cannabinoid must follow all applicable requirements for a supplement under relevant FDA regulations. (Legislating CBD As Lawful Supplement Ingredient A Threatening Precedent For US Industry)

Both bills would waive for hemp-derived cannabinoids an FDA regulation prohibiting the use in supplements and food of ingredients that have been studied as or are approved for use in a drug. Although the regulation officially prohibits the ingredients use in those products currently, the agency since early 2019 has exercised enforcement discretion for products containing cannabinoids that are manufactured and marketed in compliance with all relevant requirements.

Safe Daily Level Also An Outlier

CRN, as well as other industry stakeholders, also oppose a recommendation some others in the industry have made to require the FDA to determine a safe daily consumption level for cannabinoids before making lawful their use in food and supplements.

“The industry and agency can work through these issues with the existing regulation under DSHEA,” Mister argues. “This concerns us in the same way we are concerned about setting a daily safe level for CBD. We don’t let FDA do that for any other dietary ingredients.”

“In fact, DSHEA flips the presumption for other ingredients and says the burden to prove something is unsafe is on the agency. So we are very concerned with letting CBD undermine some of these basic principles of DSHEA, just because we are trying to get CBD on the market quickly. We could do some long-term damage to DSHEA if we bend the rules for CBD,” he added

Neither the Senate nor House bill sets a daily safe level for CBD, which some in the industry, including the Natural Products Association, is needed to prevent over-consumption and to eliminate bad products. (Mixing Food In Legislation Changing US FDA Cannabinoid Rules Could Choke Its Progress)


Read also


Next steps

Whether you’re a small biotech start-up, research firm, generic manufacturer or a global pharmaceutical giant, you need focused, independent insight and opinion on market developments.

Our team is always happy to hear from you. Please call us at:

  • US Toll-Free  : +1 888 670 8900
  • US Toll           : +1 908 547 2200
  • UK & Europe : +44 (20) 337 73737
  • Australia        : +61 2 8705 6907
  • Japan              : +81 3 6273 4260

Or please submit your inquiry via the form so that we can provide you the best possible customer service.

Have an immediate and specific information need?

Browse and buy from 1000s of analysis and research reports now: